Coaching an Embedded Practice in real work.
Name what moves before you say yes, so the cost is visible, not discovered later.
Saying yes without naming what moves is not accommodation. It's avoidance with a deadline attached.
Are they catching it in time?
A request comes in that could displace committed work. Note whether you're reading, witnessing, or hearing about it secondhand.
Is the new or default action running?
Did they pause and name what moves before saying yes — or agree first and find the cost later?
Is this a pattern, or one good moment?
Trade-offs get named before they agree, not discovered after. Check this holds more than once.
Is it showing up unprompted?
No prompting needed. They name what moves by default, and people start expecting it before they even ask.
Consistent evidence the trade-off is named before the yes — without a reminder.